Businessman Raj Kundra has recorded composed notes in an anticipatory bail application in Bombay High Court regarding porn case involving Poonam Pandey and Sherlyn Chopra. The court last week adjourned the consultation for the situation to Monday, November 22. In his written notes, Kundra’s legitimate group, headed by advocate Prashant Patil and advocate Swapnil Ambure, has articulated sections 67, and 67(a) of the IT Act. Not suitable for the situation.
The Bombay High Court asked Kundra about the two sections that have been forced into the situation. Only these two sections are non-bailable in the Cyber Cell Police case. The remaining clauses claimed for the position are bailable.
Section 67 of the Act deals with punishment for publishing or transmitting obscene material in electronic form, and section 67A deals with punishment for publishing or transmitting material in electronic form containing sexually explicit acts, etc. does.
Kundra’s record, documented through advocates Prashant P Patil and Swapnil Ambure, mentions that the main charge of prosecution against the businessman is in relation to alleged personal videos of actors Sherlyn Chopra and Poonam Pandey, who are co-accused in the case.
Kundra said the recording may be erotic, yet it does not include any actual sexual activity or the two persons involved in a sexual relationship.
The document notes that Kundra is not associated with the manufacture, distribution of the substance, or in any event, the communication of the recording being referenced. It is “shot by experts, in which the artisans have given complete consent and understanding honestly and without any fear.”
Kundra’s legal advisors said that the said Act “can be fully covered under the Unholy Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986. Appropriately, the entire Act is bailable.”
The document further states that Chopra and Pandey, through their own OTT application provided by Kundra’s organisation, had complete control over telecommunications and circulation, and obtained compensation from it.
Another document submitted to the court by the legal counsel states that Kundra, who is a UK resident, is not named in the FIR and has been included in the case due to the claims of other co-accused.
Kundra said he turned to an overseer of Armsprime Pvt Ltd, which claimed the application in February 2019 and left the organization in December 2019. The purported video of Sherlyn Chopra was transferred after the artist walked out of Kundra’s outfit. ,
Kundra was arrested by the Mumbai Crime Branch on July 19 on charges of producing and distributing porn films using “Hotshots”, a subscriber-driven mobile app.
Kundra was booked under sections 420 (cheating), 34 (general intent), 292 and 293 (relating to obscene and obscene advertisements and demonstrations) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), except in the areas of IT Act and obscene A case of representation was registered. Women (Prohibition) Act. He was also granted bail in September after the Mumbai Police filed a charge sheet against him.
Bollywood News – Live Updates
Catch us for the latest Bollywood News, new bollywood movies Update, Box office collection, new movies release , bollywood news hindi, Entertainment News, bollywood live news today And upcoming movies 2021 And stay updated with latest Hindi movies only on Bollywood Hungama.